(Shri
Jose Paul (Delhi) questions the relevance of the rite war and the Churchian
interpretation of all being one in the Mystical Body of Christ. Both do not
go together or fit in the same box - Almayasabdam)
The so
called Latin and Syrian churches existed in our country for the last five to
six centuries. Plenty of blood had been shed by members of both the rivals in
the past. Is that blood not sufficient for stopping this rite war? As
Catholics, can’t we forget and forgive each other and be one in the Mystical
Body of Christ?
The
fact that there are more than a score of autonomous churches existing is not a
justifiable reason for creating more division where division does not
exist.
The
Syrian church is trying to uphold the traditional values. When we are aware
that some of the traditional values are inhuman, we have to discard them. This
is what Christ came for, lived for and died for. We have in India many
traditional practices, values which were and still are inhuman.
The
practice of sati in which the wife sacrificing her life in the funeral pyre of
the husband, the dowry system, the caste system in the Hindu community, and
infanticide are some of the traditional practices and non-values. The modern
man, the democratic India, the elite of the society, especially emerging youth
of India are all fighting against these evils. Just because some practices were
a part of the tradition, does not justify their continuation.
The
Catholic community is supposed to be devoid of caste system. The Church
proclaims that every catholic is the child of God and they are equal in the
eyes of God and the Church. In spite of it, is it not a fact that in the name
of autonomous Churches, we are promoting castes (Braminic Church)? Or
else, what is the fundamental difference between the Latin and the Syrian
faiths as Catholics?
Recognizing
and appreciating the equality of the members of the Catholic Church, the
Government of India is not giving the privileges of the dalit people in the
Church. Why not we start an autonomous Church for the Dalit Christians with a
New Archbishop for them and prove it to the Govt that though they are
Christians, they are still Dalits and we treat them as Dalits. If we have an
autonomous Brahmin Church, why not we have an autonomous Dalit Church
also?
Do we
need an Archbishop in Delhi for the tribal Catholics, an Eprachy for the
Kottayam diocese, one Eprachy each for Palai and Changanacherry dioceses and
yet another Archediocese for Malankara Syrian Catholics and each of these
groups of Catholics have different rituals and traditions.
What we
need are bishops and priests who unite people and share the love of Christ.
Instead these days, each autonomous Church is trying to get more saints for
their own Church. What we need is that we ourselves become saints of peace and
unity.
Jose Paul (Delhi)
One Church, One faith, One God, One Jesus.....very sweet to hear all these in our hymns. Every one but knows that this is only a Christian fun. Every where we see how much we are divided, by race, by culture, by citizenship, by rite.....
ReplyDeleteWe talk about a God who loves us unconditionally. The High priests say that God is not only unconditional love but infinite love too. At a phase where each individual is compelled to answer everything for himself, he may ask, 'how come that confession is necessary, where God is love unconditional?' Similar confusions continue...Perhaps Christian mysteries are never destined to cease. Or is it that we need to go for the Buddhist maxim 'thousand monks thousand religions?'